|
WSWS : Workers
Struggles : Europe
Essex fire fighters take action
By Steve James
24 June 1998
Fire fighters in Essex, England, east of London, have begun
industrial action against the local Fire Authority's decision
to cut 16 jobs and downgrade vital fire appliances at Chelmsford
Fire Station.
The one-day strike and two two-hour stoppages are against the
Authority's intention to store or remove an aerial ladder, or
staff it with part-time fire fighters. Storage or removal would
mean an aerial ladder would have to be driven to any fire in Chelmsford
from Colchester, a 40-minute drive. Home Office guidelines presently
insist that an aerial ladder be within 20 minutes of high-rise
buildings. Doubling the response time would endanger lives.
Staffing by part-time fire fighters, who are summoned by pager
and receive only two hours of weekly training, poses the same
dangers. An aerial ladder is a computerised appliance, which requires
training and skill to be properly operated.
The fire station is presently crewed by four shifts of two
full-time fire fighters, a leading fire fighter and a station
officer. Without the ladder and a full-time crew, no one in the
Chelmsford area could be safely rescued from above a building's
fifth floor.
The fire fighters' considered and highly professional attitude
to public safety contrasts sharply with Essex Fire Authority's
cynical indifference. Tony Wright, the Labour Party Chair of the
Fire Authority, described maintaining full-time crews as "restrictive
practices" and denied that these were frontline posts. Wright
and the Fire Authority intend to once again use the army and its
decrepit Green Goddess civil defence tenders during the strikes
and the 22-hour lockouts that the Fire Authority intends to impose
after next week's two-hour stoppages.
The 928 Essex fire fighters have won support from across the
country. The Fire Authority's threat to sack anyone involved in
industrial action led to nation-wide calls for walkouts and a
national strike. Up to 1,000 Fire Brigade Union (FBU) members
travelled from all parts of Britain to support an Essex fire fighters
demonstration last week.
In contrast, FBU officials have insisted there should be no
national action against either the sacking threats, or the cutbacks.
In London, 80 fire fighters' jobs are threatened and two stations
face closure. But the FBU hopes to contain the Essex dispute as
an isolated bush fire while it tries to re-open negotiations with
the Fire Authority.
FBU regional official Keith Hanscombe has written to all the
members of the Fire Authority "in order to bypass the political
blockage." His letter states: "Any window of opportunity
to break the deadlock will be welcomed by the FBU. Unfortunately,
our willingness does not seem to be matched by the political barons
of the Fire Authority."
There has been a dramatic increase in fire fighters' workloads
over the last years. An FBU press release reported that Essex
stations handled 39,976 emergency calls and mobilised for 25,278
incidents. This is a 50 percent increase since 1988. Chelmsford
figures show a similar pattern. In 1981 the Chelmsford station
took 751 fire calls, in 1986 there were 984, and by 1996 the number
had risen to 2,365.
During the same period, fire fighters have had to deal with
more complicated emergencies. Industrial and commercial development
in the area and a huge rise in traffic mean that car accidents,
people trapped in lifts, flooding, as well as home and industrial
fires are continually increasing. Last year the county's chief
fire officer called for a new fire station to be built to deal
with commercial and domestic emergencies at and around Stansted--one
of London's three airports. But since the early 1990s the county's
staffing level has been reduced, from around 970 to 928 today.
Last November the Labour government presented a consultation
paper to parliament entitled, "Fire Safety Legislation for
the Future." This detailed the government's intention to
scrap the legal obligation on all businesses to comply with their
Fire Authorities' fire prevention proposals. All but the most
"high risk establishments" will decide what is a suitable
level of fire provision. The moves guarantee that employers, particularly
small businesses, will ignore fire safety, with the inevitable
dangers this brings.
As camouflage, Labour intends to force fire fighters into a
"community safety" role, i.e., lecturing on domestic
fire safety. This is to create a climate in which fire deaths
can be blamed on individual mistakes at work and in the home,
rather than on social conditions, corporate cost-cutting and state
policy.
See Also:
British fire fighters strike against
cuts and job losses in Essex
[16 June 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |