Socialist Equality Party public meeting
Robert Kerrey and the bloody legacy of the Vietnam War
Thursday, September 13, 7 p.m. The Cooper Union School of Engineering Building, Room 605E 51 Astor Place (Between Third and Fourth Aves.)
28 August 2001
Thursday, September 13, 7 p.m.
The Cooper Union
School of Engineering Building, Room 605E
51 Astor Place
(Between Third and Fourth Aves.)
Should a war criminal be allowed to remain the head of a major American university? That is what is involved in the case of the recently selected president of the New School University in New York City, Robert Kerrey, who after concealing the truth for 32 years acknowledged he committed atrocities during the Vietnam War.
After revelations about his role became public, the former Democratic Senator and presidential aspirant said he led a squadron of Navy Seals commandos in a 1969 attack on a Vietnamese village in which he and six soldiers under his command killed 21 women, children and elderly men. The raid was one of the hundreds of such massacres conducted under Operation Phoenix, the CIA-run program that involved the torture of hundreds of thousands and the assassination of 20,000 people.
After these revelations, the New School’s board of trustees gave Kerrey its “unqualified support.” In response the graduate student union, some faculty members and others called for Kerrey’s removal, a demand the Socialist Equality Party fully supports. In the ensuing summer months, however, Kerrey has received the open or tacit support of the media and official liberal circles in New York, which have all but dropped any mention of the controversy.
Kerrey’s continued tenure as president of the New School—a university long identified with opposition to militarism and political persecution—is a political affront to students, faculty members and working people throughout New York and the rest of the country. Would those who claim Kerrey’s crimes are irrelevant because they took place 30 years ago say the same thing if a former Nazi killer or Chilean death squad leader was put in the same position?
Kerrey has defended his actions on the grounds that the US was engaged in a war for democracy. This is a lie. The war in Vietnam was waged to defend the economic and geo-strategic interests of the corporate and political elite in America. After the Vietnamese people defeated the US-backed French colonialists, the US stepped in to maintain foreign domination of the small and underdeveloped country. The war—which killed three million Vietnamese and laid waste to much of the country—exposed before the whole world the violence and brutality of American capitalism and provoked mass protests in the US and internationally. It is forever identified with such phrases and terms as napalm, My Lai, “search and destroy,” Agent Orange, body counts and “destroying a village to save it.”
What has the Kerrey case revealed? The entire political establishment, with the cooperation of the media and the vast majority of academia, is trying to falsify history and rehabilitate one of the most brutal imperialist wars in history. They are relying upon the lack of knowledge about the war, particularly among the younger generation, to declare it was an “honorable” struggle, and in that way create the conditions to manipulate public opinion to support future wars in the Middle East, Latin America and elsewhere.
This is why it is critical to discuss the truth about the Vietnam War, why it evoked worldwide protests, and the historical and political significance of the efforts to defend Kerrey and sweep this bloody chapter in US and world history under the rug. A full and honest appraisal of the US role in Vietnam is an indispensable part of developing a political struggle against militarism, inequality and the capitalist system, which breeds these evils. We urge students, faculty members and workers in New York to attend our public meeting to discuss these vital questions.